Brett C. wrote: > -------------------------------------- > Is an int/long combined type worth it? > -------------------------------------- > language evolution > > Dmitry Vasiliev pointed out that `PEP 237`_ (Unifying Long Integers and > Integers) mentioned that a a new type named 'integer' might be > introduced that subclassed both int and long. The discussion waivered > between whether it was at all needed, and if it was if it should be a > true type or just a tuple containing both types for use with isinstance() . > > No conclusion was reached in the end. > > .. _PEP 237: http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0237.html > > Contributing threads: > - `Unifying Long Integers and Integers: baseint > <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047404.html>`__ The discussion has been closed at: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=5470&atid=305470&func=detail&aid=1007068 -- Dmitry Vasiliev (dima at hlabs.spb.ru) http://hlabs.spb.ru
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4