RetroSearch Browse

Fri Aug 20 00:41:47 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/048127.html

On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 11:58:12 +0100, Gareth McCaughan
<gmccaughan at synaptics-uk.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 2004-08-19 06:58, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> >
> > Well, do people generally buy those rejections, or is their consensus
> > that I'm mistaken?
> 
> I'm one of the people who doesn't really feel it's worth trying.
> *My* consensus :-) is that you're mistaken. I think that
> 

I agree with Gareth on both of his main points: I didn't buy Guido's
rejection of list-after-def (and so argued against his points in
another thread here); but the decorator suite before the def (J2) is
quite nice also, and it doesn't hide the def when there are lots of
decorators (due to the indentation). I would strongly support either
proposal over the current @decorators.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/048127.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 318: Can't we all just get along?