"Roman Suzi" <rnd at onego.ru> wrote in message
news:Pine.LNX.4.58.0408190817070.16021 at rnd.onego.ru...
> and their support for "write once" concept, while in old syntax one need
> to write a function name 4 times to merely get it decorated and with
__doc__
> string.
I believed this once also, but then realized that one only need write a
long function name once (other than in the doc string) -- in the final
assignment. Perhaps something like
d = '''actual_long_name(ague) == return syncroed flooblejack
ague == seq of doobies
'''
def f(ague):
pass
f.__doc__ = d
f.atto = 'yes'
actual_long_name = syncro(staticmethod(deco(f)))
Even without a doc string or comment at the top, finding the actual name at
the bottem of a block might be as easy as finding it in the middle of a
block with several @ lines.
So I no longer count this as so strong an argument against the postfix form
as I one did.
Terry J. Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4