On Thu, Aug 19, 2004, Gareth McCaughan wrote: > On Thursday 2004-08-19 06:58, Guido van Rossum wrote: >> >>> From the posts I've seen here, the only alternatives that have >>> considerable popular support are ones that you've already >>> rejected. So I suspect nobody really feels it's worth trying. >> >> Well, do people generally buy those rejections, or is their consensus >> that I'm mistaken? > > I'm one of the people who doesn't really feel it's worth trying. > *My* consensus :-) is that you're mistaken. I think that > > - the @-syntax is horrible and unpythonic as all-get-out, > but usable; > > - your arguments against the []-before-colon form are utterly > bogus; Aside from changing "utterly bogus" to "excessive", I'm entirely +1 on everything Gareth wrote in his post. -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated. You discover truth everytime you use it." --reddy at lion.austin.ibm.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4