Guido van Rossum wrote: >> From the posts I've seen here, the only alternatives that have >> considerable popular support are ones that you've already >> rejected. So I suspect nobody really feels it's worth trying. > > Well, do people generally buy those rejections, or is their consensus > that I'm mistaken? I don't know about consensus, but there are a considerable number of people who think you're mistaken (it's gotten pretty heated over on c.l.py at times). Personally, I think you're mistaken about decorators being hidden in list-after-def, and problems with large, multi-line decorators - I think such problems would be few and far between. I also think that decorators are *not* the most important part of a function's signature - even classmethod - but should be *part* of a function's signature. Tim Delaney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4