Guido van Rossum wrote: > Is anybody seriously trying to come up with a single alternative > decorator proposal that most folks "out there" can support, to be > presented to me (with implementation, please!) in time for 2.4b1? I'm afraid that absolutely zero consensus is emerging :( I've withdrawn myself entirely from the discussions as they've proven completely useless. Last time I saw behaviour like this was PEP 308. Hmm - PEP 308 - controversial syntax. PEP 318 - controversial syntax. PEP 328 - somewhat controversial syntax (I still don't overly like it). Anyone want to guess what PEP 338 will be like? ;) Tim Delaney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4