M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > I'm still not convinced that we can simply drop the existing > immutable 8-bit string type and replace it with a mutable > bytes or buffer type, e.g. would buffer.lower() work on the > buffer itself or return a lowered copy ? The byte string type would not have a .lower method, as "lowering" is not meaningful for bytes, only for characters. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4