A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/048001.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: adding a bytes sequence type to Python

[Python-Dev] Re: adding a bytes sequence type to Python [Python-Dev] Re: adding a bytes sequence type to Python"Martin v. Löwis" martin at v.loewis.de
Wed Aug 18 19:31:28 CEST 2004
M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> If you write your string literal using just ASCII characters and
> escapes, I don't see much of a problem with different source code
> encodings. 

That is correct. I personally have no problem if byte fields and
unicode strings are connected through some encoding; I personally
think making it fixed at Latin-1 might be best.

I was merely responding to Skip's question why an encoding comes
into play at all, as byte fields inherently have no encoding, and
might not even represent character data. I was responding that
this is mostly true, except for source code.

Regards,
Martin

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4