M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > If you write your string literal using just ASCII characters and > escapes, I don't see much of a problem with different source code > encodings. That is correct. I personally have no problem if byte fields and unicode strings are connected through some encoding; I personally think making it fixed at Latin-1 might be best. I was merely responding to Skip's question why an encoding comes into play at all, as byte fields inherently have no encoding, and might not even represent character data. I was responding that this is mostly true, except for source code. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4