M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> Anyway, this whole discussion about a new bytes type doesn't
> really solve the problem that the b'...' literal was
> intended for: that of having a nice way to define (read-only)
> 8-bit binary string literals.
But why do you need a way to spell 8-bit string literals?
You can always do
"string".encode("L1")
If that is too much typing, do
def b(s):return s.encode("L1")
b("string")
Regards,
Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4