On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:23:10AM -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote: > Care to reword that without the double negative? I tried and came > up with > > That's sometimes a reason to deprecate something. > > which seems like you're saying that breaking existing > well-behaving modules is sometimes a good reason to deprecate > something. I think Guido's point was that deprecating something is not the same as making a backwards incompatible change. It probably would be good to deprecate features that will be removed in 3.0. IMO, the sys.exitfunc should not be renamed to sys._exitfunc before 3.0. Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4