A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047932.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: adding a bytes sequence type to Python

[Python-Dev] Re: adding a bytes sequence type to Python [Python-Dev] Re: adding a bytes sequence type to PythonSkip Montanaro skip at pobox.com
Tue Aug 17 15:26:31 CEST 2004
    Michael> Is this getting to (hopefully uncontroverisal!) PEP time?

One would hope.  I sent in a skeletal PEP last week asking for a number but
haven't heard back.

    Michael> Is there any consensus forming on whether bytes() instances are
    Michael> mutable or not?

ISTR Guido thought mutable was the way to go.  I don't think that efficiency
concerns will be a huge deal since it won't be used all over the place the
way strings are.  Will they need to be used as dict keys?  Doesn't seem
likely to me.

Skip
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4