On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 03:24, Tony Meyer wrote: > I don't know about shtoom, but Mike Fletcher's resourcepackage does. (It > packages up non-*.py files as *.py files). I believe that the main point of > resourcepackage is for ease of distribution (but could be wrong), so perhaps > better distribution tools make this unnecessary. It is an example use-case, > though. I'd think that in most cases, huge globs of binary byte data would better live in non-py data files. I personally don't see much of a use case for byte literals (although, +1 on a bytes type). Byte literals just aren't going to be commonly written by people I think, and any programmatic generation of byte data should just as easily live outside py files. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040817/3586cfdb/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4