RetroSearch Browse

Tue Aug 17 08:54:35 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047921.html

Guido van Rossum wrote:
> (I'm still not sold on the
> concept of bytes literals at all.)

Ok. Here's a case - in shtoom, I generate audio data. Lots
of audio data. This is broken into packets, then gets a small
header put onto each RTP packet. Right now, I'm using strings
for this. If there was a 'byte literal', I'd use it. This isn't
a huge problem right now, because strings are good enough. But
if we end up in an 'all the strings are unicode', I'll need
_some_ way to construct these packets.

-- 
Anthony Baxter     <anthony at interlink.com.au>
It's never too late to have a happy childhood.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047921.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: adding a bytes sequence type to Python