Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047838.html below:

[Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Guido van Rossum wrote:

[SNIP]
> Bah.  The types module shouldn't be the "home" for any types -- it's
> just a collection of convenient aliases, and mostly they have the
> wrong names.  It should be deprecated.
> 

Well that settles that one.  Didn't know you wanted to deprecate 
'types'.  Then __builtin__ does seem to be the only logical place.

-Brett

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4