Hi, When playing with the decorators in 2.4a2, I saw the following behavior: # wraps an object with the function, and prints this object # when the function is called. >>> def wrapwith(obj): ... def decorator(f): ... def _wrapper(*args, **kwargs): ... print "##", obj ... return f(*args, **kwargs) ... return _wrapper ... return decorator ... >>> @wrapwith("hello") ... def foo(x, y): ... """ foo! """ ... return 2*x + y ... >>> foo(4, 5) ## hello 13 >>> foo.__doc__ >>> I.e. if you wrap the function foo with the decorator, it loses the docstring. foo.__doc__ is empty. Is this behavior intended? Should the decorator in question (in this case, 'wrapwith') take care of copying of the docstring itself? Or should the decorator mechanism do this automatically (if possible)? Thanks, -- Hans Nowak (hans at zephyrfalcon.org) http://zephyrfalcon.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4