M.-A. Lemburg wrote:
> If we switch the binding of 'yyy' to mean unicode('yyy')
> some day, why can't we just continue to use the existing implementation
> for 8-bit strings for b'xxx' (the current implementation is already
> doing the right thing, meaning that it is 8-bit safe regardeless
> of the source code encoding) ?
Not exactly - the current implementation is not safe with respect to
re-encoding source in a different encoding.
Regards,
Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4