On Aug 13, 2004, at 6:12 PM, Josiah Carlson wrote: > Personally, I don't desire decorators for classes for symmetry reasons, > I desire it to replace metaclasses, at least in those things that I > could conceivably want metaclasses to do. In some cases, what you actually want ARE metaclasses. I wouldn't say get rid of them, because I use them in cases where what I actually want ARE metaclasses, but I do concede that many of the (ab)uses of metaclasses could be replaced by decorators (assuming that the decorator syntax applied to classes as well). -bob
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4