A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047805.html below:

[Python-Dev] def ... decorate

[Python-Dev] def ... decorate [Python-Dev] def ... decorateBob Ippolito bob at redivi.com
Sat Aug 14 00:27:37 CEST 2004
On Aug 13, 2004, at 6:12 PM, Josiah Carlson wrote:

> Personally, I don't desire decorators for classes for symmetry reasons,
> I desire it to replace metaclasses, at least in those things that I
> could conceivably want metaclasses to do.

In some cases, what you actually want ARE metaclasses.  I wouldn't say 
get rid of them, because I use them in cases where what I actually want 
ARE metaclasses, but I do concede that many of the (ab)uses of 
metaclasses could be replaced by decorators (assuming that the 
decorator syntax applied to classes as well).

-bob
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4