> I've kept my nose out of the decorator discussion, but I thought I would > give my opinion on this one... > > > > On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Skip Montanaro wrote: > > > > >with > > > > > > def p_statement_expr: > > > staticmethod > > > grammarrule('statement : expression') > > > version("Added in 2.4") > > > deprecatedmethod > > > type_(None) > > > decorate (self, p): > > > """docstring here""" > > > print p[1] > > > > Bingo! > > Oh god no. > > > > Just replace decorate with "from" and the nice syntax is found: > > > > def f: > > staticmethod > > grammarrule('statement : expression') > > version("Added in 2.4") > > deprecatedmethod > > type_(None) > > from self, p: > > """docstring here""" > > print p[1] > > Gah, the horror. I think we should take maximum advantage of prior art. Other languages have proven the efficacy of backwards spellings. Likewise, the reST module has proven the utility of ASCII markup. dothemcitats:: elurrammarg ``statement : expression'':: dohtemdetacerped:: `````````````````` def f(arg): . . . Advantages: * Won't delude people into thinking they can understand a python program just by reading it. * Highly adaptable to electronic parsing while discouraging the adverse trend towards human readability. * Accomplishes the life saving core goal of moving decorators up a few lines while only incurring the minor cost of complicating the snot out of the language. * Unlikely to be confused with any existing python constructs. * Takes less effort to implement, document, and test than to read all of the decorator syntax emails to date. Alternative: A further application of prior art would be to hypergeneralize the solution to this problem and design a solution using XML. This takes maximum advantage of existing tools while providing a framework for all potential future proposals to add a second or third way to accomplish things we can already do now. citsacras-ly yours, Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4