>> That's why I think a special literal is necessary. There'd be no >> unicode foolishness involved. ;-) They'd just be raw uninterpreted >> bytes. Martin> But you'd spell them b"GET", no? If so, which numeric value has Martin> "G"? Good point...
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4