On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 15:14, Skip Montanaro wrote: > I think '*' is syntactically available for this use. That was one of the characters I tried back when I was looking for @ alternatives. For some reason I can't explain, this one just rubs me the wrong way. i'll-let-tim-psychoanalyze-the-reasons-why-ly y'rs, -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040812/5f6b69ed/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4