Skip Montanaro <skip at pobox.com> writes: > My intent in proposing b"..." literals was that they would be allowed in any > source file. Their contents would not be interpreted in any way. I think this is a bad idea. If a coding cookie says a file is in utf-8, then the file really has to be valid utf-8 data, for implementation sanity and not freaking out editors. The use-case for including arbitrary chunks of binary data in a source file seems stretched in the extreme. Cheers, mwh -- My hat is lined with tinfoil for protection in the unlikely event that the droid gets his PowerPoint presentation working. -- Alan W. Frame, alt.sysadmin.recovery
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4