At 10:45 PM 8/11/04 -0700, Guido van Rossum wrote: >Anyway, if we really do have enough use cases for byte array literals, >we might add them. I still think that would be confusing though, >because byte arrays are most useful if they are mutable: and then we'd >have mutable literals -- blechhhh! Not if they work like list or dictionary "literals". That is, if they're just short for 'array("B","literal here")'.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4