> Guido:
> > Anyway, if we really do have enough use cases for byte array
> > literals, we might add them. I still think that would be confusing
> > though, because byte arrays are most useful if they are mutable: and
> > then we'd have mutable literals -- blechhhh!
Greg:
> Perhaps the constructor for a byte array could accept a string
> argument as long as it contained only ascii characters?
>
> h.putrequest(bytes('GET'), selector)
Yeah, but that's what Martin called depending on the default encoding.
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4