Michael Chermside <mcherm at mcherm.com>: > 'basestring' is a completely different issue -- there will always be > a need for both unicode and 8-bit-strings as separate types. I'm not so sure about that. There will certainly be a need for something holding an arbitrary sequence of bytes, but it's not clear that it needs to be called anything with 'string' in it. I can enivisage a future in which 'string' means unicode string, and byte sequences are called something else entirely, such as 'bytevector' or 'bytearray' (or maybe just 'array' :-). Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4