On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 08:21, Andrew Durdin wrote:
> Forgive me for being obtuse, but I can't see anything significantly
> simpler in this PEP than the standard string interpolation, except for
> the case where the identifier doesn't need braces:
>
> template("Hello, $name, how are you?") % {name: "Jim"}
> versus
> "Hello, %(name)s, how are you?") % {name: "Jim"}
>
> Apart from removing the need for the parentheses/braces in this case,
> all it does is consistently remove the "s", and replace the % with $,
> and then limiting the interpolated values to strings (or will it
> automatically use str(x) for any non-string variable x?).
> Is there any other benefit to this that I'm overlooking?
The elimination of the trailing 's' is definitely a benefit, as is the
adoption of $-placeholders, since that tends to be the placeholder
introducing character in many other languages. In terms of usability,
it's a win.
-Barry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040811/9ab236ac/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4