Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047554.html below:

[Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> Well, it's already there, but types.GeneratorType.__name__ is
> 'generator'... it could be changed to 'GeneratorType', I guess.

No, no, no!  The "new" convention for built-in type names is all
lowercase.  CamelCaseType is old and only used in the context of
types.py.

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Classes that claim to be defined in __builtin__ but aren't
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4