From: James Y Knight > So, um...I assume this is a bug in the implementation, > not the PEP, because the PEP's way makes sense and the > way it's implemented doesn't. Interestingly, I found the PEP's description felt "backwards" to me, but didn't mention it because I didn't want to start another long discussion over something which has proved to be subjective in past discussions. I'd vote for correcting the PEP rather than the code (not least because it's probably easier :-)) But consistency is the only real requirement here. Paul. __________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail and the documents attached are confidential and intended solely for the addressee; it may also be privileged. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy it. As its integrity cannot be secured on the Internet, the Atos Origin group liability cannot be triggered for the message content. Although the sender endeavours to maintain a computer virus-free network, the sender does not warrant that this transmission is virus-free and will not be liable for any damages resulting from any virus transmitted. __________________________________________________________________________
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4