A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047503.html below:

add keywords for static and class methods only [related to decorators discussion]

[Python-Dev] request: add keywords for static and class methods only [related to decorators discussion] [Python-Dev] request: add keywords for static and class methods only [related to decorators discussion]Bob Ippolito bob at redivi.com
Tue Aug 10 04:10:37 CEST 2004
On Aug 6, 2004, at 1:13 PM, Doug Holton wrote:

> After reading some posts here and the wiki page discussing the 
> decorators:  http://www.python.org/moin/PythonDecorators
> One idea that some people have suggested is to separate out standard 
> uses for decorators like function metadata, vs. built-in features of 
> python, like static methods and class methods.
>
> So I'm suggesting, don't use decorators for static and class methods.
>
> Perhaps for 2.5 or whenever, we should add keyword support for 
> built-in features, just like java:

Now that's a -1 if I've ever seen one.

-bob
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4