On Aug 9, 2004, at 10:29 AM, Mark Hahn wrote: > Forgive me if I'm being a pest, but no one has commented on the real > reason > I asked the question. What does everyone think of the idea of having > these > three built-in numeric types? > > 1) An Int implemented with infinite precision integer (Python Longs) > with > the constant/__str__ form of +-NN such as 0, -123, 173_394, etc. > > 2) A Decimal implemented with the .Net decimal float (or the IBM > decimal if > the .Net decimal sucks too much) with the constant/__str__ form of > +-NN.NN > such as 0.0, -123.0, 173_394.0, 173394.912786765, etc. > > 3) A binary Float implemented with the hardware floating point with the > constant/__str__ form of +-NN.NN+-eNN such as 0e0, -123e0, 173.39e+3, > 2.35e-78, etc. Be careful defining string representations of numbers. It is a non-trivial problem to adhere to the correct internationalization standards. Forgive me if I'm being dense, but don't we already have 1 & 3 as built in types? 2 is unlikely to be a builtin until folks get some experience using the Decimal module. Yes, the .Net Decimal sucks. In addition, the desired evolution of Python seems to be replacing the binary floating point as the default floating point type with the decimal floating point type by default rather than growing another builtin numeric type. This is obviously contingent upon the Decimal module getting some real-life use as well as it getting some speed improvements in the future. > There would be no automatic conversion except the / operator would > convert > from Int to Decimal Int goes to the default type of float (which is currently binary FP) already upon using the / operator. > and the Math module would convert Int and Decimal > values to Float for almost all functions (except simple ones like abs, > min, > max). This is not necessarily a good idea. Exponentials are very useful in financial situations and want to be decimals, not binary floats, in those cases. -a
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4