In article <1092074454.8687.26.camel at localhost>, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > > I prefer @ but am willing to accept | as a compromise. > > I agree with Paul here. The only reason I suggested | was to make life > easier for 3rd party tools. But does it? With @, a third party tool has an unambiguous indication of whether a line is a decorator. With |, it is not possible to recognize decorators with a regular expression, instead you have to do some context-free parsing to determine whether some previous line has an unclosed paren (in which case the | is a binop rather than a decorator). -- David Eppstein Computer Science Dept., Univ. of California, Irvine http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4