> I just wanted to say that I believe it should be allowed to decorate > classes. There's not reason enough (reading the thread linked to by the > PEP) to limit decorators this way. Like said several times in that > thread, metaclasses are harder (to write and to understand) than > decorators. > > Also, considering that you said you would have actually wanted > docstrings above the definition of a function, wouldn't this apply > to classes as well? > > Anyway, it's an artificial limit and it would be better to be able > to test it out during the alpha. Are you volunteering to implement it? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4