Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047265.html below:

[Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> > I haven't seen this mentioned, so I'm going to throw in my
suggestion.
> >
> > The following makes sense to me, uses previously invalid syntax, and
> > uses the '.' punctuation in a way similar to existing/proposed
usage:
> 
> -1. This violates my "syntax should not look like grit" rule.

Also, the dot prefix should probably be kept free in case a WITH
statement is ever introduced.


Raymond

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4