RetroSearch Browse

Sat Aug 7 14:59:02 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047260.html

On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 22:36:59 +1000, Andrew Durdin <adurdin at gmail.com> wrote:
> # using curry as proposed in PEP 309 [**]
> @foo_decorator
> @curry(bar_decorator, "one param here")

And that really should have been:

# using rightcurry as mentioned in PEP 309 [**]
@foo_decorator
@rightcurry(bar_decorator, "one param here")

But that's not a primary issue.
The primary issues were: (1) That decorators with vs. without
arguments look inconsistent, like function calls vs. function
references, and (2) that consequentially, decorator syntax is
implicitly introducing a non-viable currying syntax.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047260.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: Decorators with arguments are curries!