RetroSearch Browse

Sat Aug 7 11:28:56 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047251.html

Am Samstag, 7. August 2004 06:55 schrieb Kevin J. Butler:
> The following makes sense to me, uses previously invalid syntax, and
> uses the '.' punctuation in a way similar to existing/proposed usage:
>
>        def longMethodNameForEffect(longArgumentOne=None,
>                                    longArgumentTwo=42):
>            .staticmethod
>            .funcattrs(grammar="'@' dotted_name [ '(' [arglist] ')' ]",
>                       status="experimental", author="BDFL")
>            """
>            asdfasdf
>            """
>            raise NotYetImplemented

-1

Same objection from me as to the proposal of decorating with | in the 
function: it simply takes away the actual meaning from the decorator (which 
actually is to make it very clear to see that the function is special in some 
way).

Heiko.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047251.html below:

[Python-Dev] Suggesting '.' decorators (PEP318)