Tim Peters wrote: >>Yes. I don't know what to do about this: the screen sets ALLUSERS=1, >>then performs FindRelatedProducts to find the old installation. If the >>old installation was per-machine, we only find it if we commit to making >>the new installation also per-machine. > > > Except that in this case, I'm pretty sure my 2.4a1 installation was > also "only for me". I could be wrong about that. Indeed. Upgrading from a per-user installation is easy, as the whole process starts with the assumption that it is going to be per-user. Only per-machine were previously not upgradable. > I believe I later saw a checkin that intended to fix this, and, if so, > that's cool too. I hereby nominate you as MSI-builder For Life > <wink>. Yes, and thanks :-) Part of my recent talking goes along with the hope that others become interested enough in MSI as a technology to be able to contribute, though. While I have your attention: you have commented that the installer logo needs attribution, during the installation process. Is this still the case, and what is the text I should use? Any other attribution that needs to be made? A colleague has commented that logo is too low-res, is ugly, and does not feature reptiles. Should we look for an update to the logo? Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4