Martin> In Python, things at the same indentation level all belong
Martin> together.
I think the point is that the collection of @-decorators and the immediately
following function definition (which can be separated from each other by a
lot of white space or comments, btw) effectively form a single function
definition. I don't believe there are any other syntactic constructs in
Python where the keyword introducing the construct ("def" in this case)
doesn't occur at the beginning of the construct.
Hmmm... Now that I think about it, might you "lose" an @ in a comment block
since # and @ have more-or-less the same density? | might not suffer from
that sort of confusion.
# description of what decorator1 does
# description of what decorator1 does
# description of what decorator1 does
@ decorator1
# description of what decorator2 does
# description of what decorator2 does
# description of what decorator2 does
@ decorator2
# description of what func does
# description of what func does
# description of what func does
def func(...):
pass
vs.
# description of what decorator1 does
# description of what decorator1 does
# description of what decorator1 does
| decorator1
# description of what decorator2 does
# description of what decorator2 does
# description of what decorator2 does
| decorator2
# description of what func does
# description of what func does
# description of what func does
def func(...):
pass
Eh, maybe not. Small point in any case, I'm sure.
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4