> > Is there something to be done that could change the current > > decision? Voting? Collecting pros/cons and classifying them? > > Yes, there is. And it's not voting <wink>. > > Write a simple "white paper" summarizing the major arguments > and showing how they apply to the 3 or 4 top syntax proposals. > Solicit input from c.l.py or python-dev after you have a first > draft. After the 3rd draft is done, post it here and send it > to Guido. Then sit back and quietly put up with the resulting > decision whether you agree or not. I just did that. I've gone through all the recent discussions updating the Wiki page with mentioned arguments and new syntax proposals. > At this point, I long ago said most everything I had to say > and so I'm working on the "quietly put up with the results" > part myself. I don't think there's something else I could collaborate either. -- Gustavo Niemeyer http://niemeyer.net
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4