On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 21:21, Anthony Baxter wrote: > My take on the @decorator syntax is that after initially > hating it, I've found it growing on me more and more. > It's extremely clear and very readable. Most importantly, > in my eyes, it's obviously grouped with the def that > follows it. From being a -0 (when Guido first mentioned > it) to a +0 (at the time of checkin) I'm now +1 on this > form of decorator. I'm also +1 on using the format/position of the @decorators. It's vastly superior to list-before-colon or list-before-def. See my other post for alternative possible solutions to Leo/ipython problem. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040806/0c5906b4/attachment-0001.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4