On Fri, 06 Aug 2004 14:35:08 +1200, Greg Ewing <greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz> wrote: > "Phillip J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com>: > > > Now, I don't know if my thought process here is at all typical or > > representative of anything, other than my own idiosyncratic self. > > You're not alone. I agree with *everything* you said there. +1 Eby's is the best argument I've heard so far. I favor list-after-def over @ for decorator syntax -- FWIW. List after def seems very unambiguously some kind of modifier of a function or method. Kendall Grant Clark Managing Editor, XML.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4