RetroSearch Browse

Fri Aug 6 04:15:30 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047029.html

"Phillip J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com>:

> That argument has been done to death several times in the last year 
> here.  Function attributes aren't a replacement for decorators.

Just to be clear, I wasn't arguing in my last post that decorators
should be replaced by function attributes. I was questioning the
assumption that "use cases exist for long decorators, therefore any
syntax for decorators needs to accommodate them".

In other words, a syntax for short decorators plus a syntax for long
function arguments might be sufficient.

There might even be a proof of sorts for this: arguments to the
decorator can be substituted with attributes on the function about to
be decorated, which the decorator extracts.

Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+
University of Canterbury,	   | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a	  |
Christchurch, New Zealand	   | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc.  |
greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz	   +--------------------------------------+

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047029.html below:

[Python-Dev] Call for defense of @decorators