Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/047000.html below:

[Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Edward K. Ream wrote:
> Ok.  Consider me dense.  But I'm just wanting something that _looks_ like a
> module reference but isn't really.  What it is really is a stand-in for '@'.
> Wouldn't this allow user-defined annotations, provided the compiler was in
> on the joke?  In essence, what I am asking for is
> just-another-name-for-at-sign.

In essence, you are proposing to reserve a new keyword. Solutions 
creating new keywords have been ruled out because they might break
existing code.

Regards,
Martin

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4