RetroSearch Browse

Fri Aug 6 01:13:16 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046999.html

Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
> After writing this list, I thought about something which is
> close to the current implementation, but avoids @. If it was
> already suggested, please forgive me. At least I wasn't able
> to find it in the PEP/Wiki:
> 
>     <static>
>     def method(foo):
>         pass

This is discussed in the PEP:

The '<...>' alternative presents parsing problems because '<' and '>' 
already parse as un-paired. They present a further parsing ambiguity 
because a right angle bracket might be a greater than symbol instead of 
a closer for the decorators.

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046999.html below:

[Python-Dev] Similar syntax