In article <5.1.1.6.0.20040805160715.01f0c060 at mail.telecommunity.com>, "Phillip J. Eby" <pje at telecommunity.com> wrote: > Guido has stated he'll accept one community syntax proposal as an > alternative to "@". He's also ruled out his own previous proposal > (list-before-def), and a variety of new-keyword alternatives involving such > things as 'as' and 'with'. > > There doesn't appear to be a downside for decorator supporters to put forth > another syntax, if they like it better than "@"; it seems the worst case is > that we still end up with "@", if we end up with any syntax at all. It's clear from previous discussions that there can be no single community preference. The downside to me is that all this brouhaha will prevent us from getting any syntax at all. -- David Eppstein Computer Science Dept., Univ. of California, Irvine http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4