+1 on @decorator style for being clear, unambiguous and useful
(and not bad to look at once you get used to it).
clear: * it's more visible and less messy than any of the
before-/after-/behind-def style decorations;
* it stands out. this is a good thing.
unambiguous: unlike the other viable prefix notation it makes 2.4
code special.
useful: just having a special decoration syntax makes it useful.
decorations can make the behaviour of a function or class seem more
magic than otherwise, but at least the @decoration style makes it
more obvious that something is going on.
On 2004-08-05, at 18.36, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> [...] you might want to say something in public in defense of
> @decorators.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4