A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046949.html below:

[Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318

[Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318 [Python-Dev] Questions about '@' in pep 318Fred L. Drake, Jr. fdrake at acm.org
Thu Aug 5 23:16:09 CEST 2004
On Thursday 05 August 2004 04:55 pm, Gustavo Niemeyer wrote:
 > Good point. This paragraph should be changed, if it wasn't yet.

Now changed in CVS.

 > Every tool which deals with Python's syntax must be adapted
 > to the new syntax, no matter which new syntax is adopted.

I expect many tools won't be affected by @decorations.  Import checkers and 
function/method identifying tools probably won't care about the decorations.  
In the end, it very much depends on the assumptions of the tool and how it 
implements scanning and parsing.


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.  <fdrake at acm.org>

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4