On 5-aug-04, at 22:11, Neil Schemenauer wrote: > On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 09:54:17PM +0200, Ronald Oussoren wrote: >> Not every method is a property accessor. The metaclass does calculate >> a >> default signature (all arguments are objects and the result is an >> object) when it doesn't have better information (such as the signature >> of a method with the same name in a superclass). > > Sorry I wasn't clearer. What I meant was if we have a nice syntax > for setting function attributes then the metaclass to transform the > functions just like a decorator could. And how would that solve this: <http://www.eby-sarna.com/pipermail/peak/2004-July/001598.html> Ronald
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4