On Thu, Aug 05, 2004 at 09:54:17PM +0200, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > Not every method is a property accessor. The metaclass does calculate a > default signature (all arguments are objects and the result is an > object) when it doesn't have better information (such as the signature > of a method with the same name in a superclass). Sorry I wasn't clearer. What I meant was if we have a nice syntax for setting function attributes then the metaclass to transform the functions just like a decorator could. Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4