I received the following from GvR in a private communication: > If good arguments against @ are presented it may be removed in 2.4b1 (that was always the plan but apparently not publicized). I am going to take this as an invitation to discuss @ syntax again. Given the controversy, a reexamination of the major issues seems not only reasonable, but desirable. Please feel free to send me links to relevant discussion, but given the apparent lack of consensus at present I would not like to be told to read the entire py-dev archives. > Please bring up the Leo issues in Python-dev. I'll be posting on separate threads soon. Edward -------------------------------------------------------------------- Edward K. Ream email: edreamleo at charter.net Leo: Literate Editor with Outlines Leo: http://webpages.charter.net/edreamleo/front.html --------------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4