Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> writes:
> It seems a public outcry against @decorators has started. When I let
> Anthony check it in for 2.4a2, the plan was to see how it fares in a2
> and a3, and possibly take it out in 2.4b1. If you don't want that to
> happen, you might want to say something in public in defense of
> @decorators.
Like what? I don't want to see that happen.
Do you want justifications, too? :-)
I would beg of you to not give the idea that you or anyone else is
going to be counting votes on this at some point.
> An argument about timing: IMO there's no point in putting it off until
> 2.5 -- the syntax options don't get prettier, backwards compatibility
> issues don't get easier by waiting, and as it is it will probably take
> a year from 2.4's release in December before it is the mainstream
> Python version.
+1
Cheers,
mwh
--
ARTHUR: The ravenours bugblatter beast of Traal ... is it safe?
FORD: Oh yes, it's perfectly safe ... it's just us who are in
trouble.
-- The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy, Episode 6
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4