> Just a question, when "as" become a keyword in Python 3, can we expect a > new syntax using that keyword instead (or additionally)? There's > multiple possible syntaxes using "as", even replacing simply @ by "as" > would be an improvement IMHO, since that would be english-readable (as > static method define foo), like most of Python. When 'as' becomes a keyword, it is open for use in other syntax, but it won't be used for decorators (as long as I'm BDFL). 'as' suggests a renaming (like it does in import and in SQL) or perhaps a type (I've seen "as duck" in a new vaguely Pythonic language named "boo"), but that's not what decorators doo. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4